`cvCovEst`

: Cross-Validated
Covariance Matrix EstimationWhen the number of observations in a dataset far exceeds the number of features, the estimator of choice for the covariance matrix is the sample covariance matrix. It is an efficient estimator under minimal regularity assumptions on the data-generating distribution. In high-dimensional regimes, however, this estimator leaves much to be desired: The sample covariance matrix is either singular, numerically unstable, or both, thereby amplifying estimation error.

As high-dimensional data have become widespread, researchers have derived many novel covariance matrix estimators to remediate the sample covariance matrix’s deficiencies. These estimators come in many flavours, though most are constructed by regularizing the sample covariance matrix, or through the estimation of latent factors. A comprehensive review is provided by Fan, Liao, and Liu (2016).

This variety brings with it many challenges. Identifying an “optimal” estimator from among a collection of candidates can prove a daunting task, one whose objectivity is often compromised by the analyst’s decisions. Though data-driven approaches for selecting an optimal estimator from among estimators belonging to certain (limited) classes have been derived, the question of selecting an estimator from among a diverse collection of candidates remains unaddressed.

We therefore offer a general, cross-validation-based framework for covariance matrix estimator selection to tackle just that. The high-dimensional asymptotic optimality of selections are guaranteed based upon extensions of the seminal work of Dudoit and van der Laan (2003), Dudoit and van der Laan (2005), and van der Vaart, Dudoit, and van der Laan (2006) on data-adaptive estimator selection to high-dimensional covariance matrix estimation (Boileau et al. 2021). The interested reader is invited to review theoretical underpinnings of the methodology as described in Boileau et al. (2021).

Let there be a high-dimensional dataset comprising \(n\) realizations of \(i.i.d.\) \(p\)-length random vectors with a possibly nonparametric data-generating distribution. Our goal is to estimate these random vectors’ covariance matrix, which may be accomplished using our general cross-validated estimator selection framework.

Given a library of candidate estimators, a loss function, and a
choice of cross-validation scheme, `cvCovEst()`

will identify
the asymptotically optimal estimator of the covariance matrix from among
all candidates. It subsequently estimates this parameter using the
selected candidate. An example is provided below. Lists and brief
descriptions of implemented candidate estimators, loss functions, and
cross-validation schemes are provided in the sequel.

`## cvCovEst v1.2.2: Cross-Validated Covariance Matrix Estimation`

```
set.seed(1584)
# generate a 50x50 covariance matrix with unit variances and off-diagonal
# elements equal to 0.5
sigma <- matrix(0.5, nrow = 50, ncol = 50) + diag(0.5, nrow = 50)
# sample 50 observations from multivariate normal with mean = 0, var = Sigma
dat <- mvrnorm(n = 50, mu = rep(0, 50), Sigma = sigma)
# run CV-selector
cv_cov_est_out <- cvCovEst(
dat = dat,
estimators = c(
linearShrinkLWEst, denseLinearShrinkEst,
thresholdingEst, poetEst, sampleCovEst
),
estimator_params = list(
thresholdingEst = list(gamma = c(0.2, 0.4)),
poetEst = list(lambda = c(0.1, 0.2), k = c(1L, 2L))
),
cv_loss = cvMatrixFrobeniusLoss,
cv_scheme = "v_fold",
v_folds = 5,
)
# print the table of risk estimates
cv_cov_est_out$risk_df
```

```
## # A tibble: 9 × 3
## estimator hyperparameters cv_risk
## <chr> <chr> <dbl>
## 1 linearShrinkLWEst hyperparameters = NA 357.
## 2 poetEst lambda = 0.2, k = 1 368.
## 3 poetEst lambda = 0.2, k = 2 371.
## 4 poetEst lambda = 0.1, k = 2 375.
## 5 poetEst lambda = 0.1, k = 1 376.
## 6 denseLinearShrinkEst hyperparameters = NA 379.
## 7 sampleCovEst hyperparameters = NA 379.
## 8 thresholdingEst gamma = 0.2 384.
## 9 thresholdingEst gamma = 0.4 501.
```

```
## [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
## [1,] 0.9915849 0.4232142 0.4703010 0.2953967 0.4311018
## [2,] 0.4232142 0.8352338 0.5837626 0.2669701 0.4781952
## [3,] 0.4703010 0.5837626 1.0119369 0.2730617 0.4219522
## [4,] 0.2953967 0.2669701 0.2730617 0.7356122 0.2021566
## [5,] 0.4311018 0.4781952 0.4219522 0.2021566 0.9909058
```

Covariance matrix estimators implemented in the `cvCovEst`

package are catalogued in the following table. These estimators are fed
to the `cvCovEst()`

function through the
`estimators`

argument as a vector. If these estimators rely
on hyperparameters, then they must be passed to the
`estimator_params`

as a list. Depending on one’s assumptions
— or lack thereof — about the true covariance matrix, one may choose to
use a subset of these estimators or all of them. Of course, they may
also be used as standalone functions.

Estimator | Implementation | Description |
---|---|---|

Sample covariance matrix | `sampleCovEst()` |
The sample covariance matrix. |

Hard thresholding (Bickel and Levina 2008b) | `thresholdingEst()` |
Applies a hard thresholding operator to the entries of the sample covariance matrix. |

SCAD thresholding (Rothman, Levina, and Zhu 2009; Fan and Li 2001) | `scadEst()` |
Applies the SCAD thresholding operator to the entries of the sample covariance matrix. |

Adaptive LASSO (Rothman, Levina, and Zhu 2009) | `adaptiveLassoEst()` |
Applies the adaptive LASSO thresholding operator to the entries of the sample covariance matrix. |

Banding (Bickel and Levina 2008a) | `bandingEst()` |
Replaces the sample covariance matrix’s off-diagonal bands by zeros. |

Tapering (Cai, Zhang, and Zhou 2010) | `taperingEst()` |
Tapers the sample covariance matrix’s off-diagonal bands, eventually replacing them by zeros. |

Optimal Linear Shrinkage (Ledoit and Wolf 2004) | `linearShrinkLWEst()` |
Asymptotically optimal shrinkage of the sample covariance matrix towards the identity. |

Linear Shrinkage (Ledoit and Wolf 2004) | `linearShrinkEst()` |
Shrinkage of the sample covariance matrix towards the identity, but the shrinkage is controlled by a hyperparameter. |

Dense Linear Shrinkage (Schäfer and Strimmer 2005) | `denseLinearShrinkEst()` |
Asymptotically optimal shrinkage of the sample covariance matrix towards a dense matrix whose diagonal elements are the mean of the sample covariance matrix’s diagonal, and whose off-diagonal elements are the mean of the sample covariance matrix’s off-diagonal elements. |

Nonlinear Shrinkage (Ledoit and Wolf 2018) | `nlShrinkLWEst()` |
Analytical estimator for the nonlinear shrinkage of the sample covariance matrix. |

POET (Fan, Liao, and Mincheva 2013) | `poetEst()` |
An estimator based on latent variable estimation and thresholding. |

Robust POET (Fan, Liu, and Wang 2018) | `robustPoetEst()` |
A robust (and more computationally taxing) take on the POET estimator. |

Spiked Operator Loss Shrinkage (Donoho, Gavish, and Johnstone 2018) | `spikedOperatorShrinkEst()` |
The asymptotically optimal shrinkage estimator based on the operator loss in a Gaussian spiked covariance model. |

Spiked Frobenius Loss Shrinkage (Donoho, Gavish, and Johnstone 2018) | `spikedFrobeniusShrinkEst()` |
The asymptotically optimal shrinkage estimator based on the Frobenius loss in a Gaussian spiked covariance model. |

Spiked Stein Loss Shrinkage (Donoho, Gavish, and Johnstone 2018) | `spikedSteinShrinkEst()` |
The asymptotically optimal shrinkage estimator based on the Stein loss in a Gaussian spiked covariance model. |

Note that `cvCovEst()`

only functions with estimators
native to this package. If you’d like to request a new estimator
implementation, please submit an issue to the
queue.

Given a collection of candidate estimators, `cvCovEst()`

compares their conditional cross-validated risks to identify the optimal
selection. The loss function used to compute these risks should reflect
both aspects of the data-generating distribution and the goal of the
estimation procedure. This package currently implements three loss
functions:

Loss | Implementation | Description |
---|---|---|

Matrix-based Frobenius | `cvMatrixFrobeniusLoss()` |
The default, based on the Frobenius norm. Appropriate when the dataset’s features are of similar magnitudes. |

Variance-scaled matrix-based Frobenius | `cvScaledMatrixFrobeniusLoss()` |
A scaled version of the matrix-based Frobenius loss, where weights are the inverse of products from the sample covariance matrix’s diagonal. Appropriate when the features of the dataset are of different magnitudes. |

Observation-based Frobenius | `cvFrobeniusLoss()` |
Based on the Frobenius norm and the rank-1, observation-level estimates of the sample covariance matrix. Its selections are equivalent to that of the matrix-based Frobenius, though less computationally efficient. However, the optimality results of Boileau et al. (2021) rely on it. |

The choice of loss function is set trough the `cv_loss`

argument. Like the candidate estimators, `cvCovEst()`

only
supports loss functions implemented in this package. Please submit
suggestions to the issue
queue.

Two cross-validation schemes are currently supported by
`cvCovEst()`

. Please consider filing an issue in the
queue to request the implementation of another cross-validation
scheme.

Scheme | Details |
---|---|

V-fold | To use V-fold cross-validation, set the `cv_scheme`
argument in `cvCovEst()` to `"v_fold"` , and set
the number of folds through the `v_folds` argument.
`cvCovEst()` defaults to 5-fold cross-validation. |

Monte-Carlo | To perform Monte-Carlo cross-validation, set the
`cv_scheme` argument to `"mc"` . Set the proportion
of data to be used in each validation set using the
`mc_split` argument, and the number of iterations to perform
with the `v_folds` argument. |

In addition to selecting an optimal estimator, the
`cvCovEst`

package contains summary and plotting methods
which highlight the statistical properties of the candidate estimators,
and inform the performance of the selection framework. These tools help
build intuition about these estimators’ behavior and allows for the
evaluation of their performance over varying inputs.

The `summary()`

method for `cvCovEst`

accepts
an `object`

argument, a named `list`

of class
`cvCovEst`

, a `dat_orig`

argument, the original
data used to calculate the covariance matrix estimates, and a
`summ_fun`

argument, a character vector specifying the type
of summary function to use.

These summary functions allow the user to quickly compare the
performance of several classes of estimators and compute other metrics
of interest. The choices of `summ_fun`

and their outputs are
described below:

Summary | Implementation | Description |
---|---|---|

Empirical Risk by Estimator Class | `empRiskByClass` |
Returns the minimum, 1^{st} quartile, median, 3^{rd}
quartile, and maximum of the empirical risk associated with each class
of estimator passed to `cvCovEst()` . |

Best Performing Estimator by Class | `bestInClass` |
Returns the specific hyperparameters, if applicable, of the best performing estimator within each class along with additional metrics. |

Worst Performing Estimator by Class | `worstInClass` |
Returns the specific hyperparameters, if applicable, of the worst performing estimator within each class along with additional metrics. |

Empirical Risk by Hyperparameter | `hyperRisk` |
For estimators that take hyperparameters as arguments, this returns
the hyperparameters associated with the minimum, 1^{st}
quartile, median, 3^{rd} quartile, and maximum of the empirical
risk within each class of estimator. Each class has its own
`tibble` which are returned as a `list` . |

When either `bestInClass`

or `worstInClass`

is
specified, the additional metrics are the condition number, the sign,
and the sparsity. Sign refers to the estimate’s sign and is one of
positive-definite (`"PD"`

), positive-semi-definite (“PSD”),
negative-definite (“ND”), negative-semi-definite (“NSD”), or indefinite
(“IND”). If an estimate results in a zero matrix, then the sign is
returned as `"NA"`

. Sparsity is calculated at the proportion
of total entries in the estimate which are equal to zero.

The `plot()`

method for `cvCovEst`

allows users
to visualize three main `plot_type`

s of the candidate
estimators: covariance heat maps (`heatmap`

), eigenvalue
plots (`eigen`

), and the empirical risk (`risk`

)
as a function of the hyperparameters (for applicable estimator classes).
If users do not specify a plot type, then all three plots are combined
into one figure for the optimal estimator selected by
`cvCovEst()`

. Users can also achieve this by setting
`plot_type = "summary"`

.

The heat maps and eigenvalue plots facilitate comparisons both within
and between estimator classes by allowing multiple values to be passed
as `estimator`

and `stat`

arguments.

Additional arguments specific to each `plot_type`

are
outlined below:

Argument | Description |
---|---|

abs_v | If `TRUE` , then the absolute value of the covariance is
mapped. Otherwise, the signed value is used. |

Argument | Description |
---|---|

leading | If `TRUE` , then the k leading eigenvalues are displayed.
Otherwise, the k trailing eigenvalues are displayed. |

k | The number of leading or trailing eigenvalues to plot. |

These two additional arguments only apply to estimators with multiple hyperparameters:

Argument | Description |
---|---|

switch_vars | If `TRUE` , the hyperparameters used for the x-axis and
factor variables are switched. |

min_max | If `TRUE` , only the minimum and maximum values of the
factor hyperparameter will be used. |

To show how the plot and summary methods can be used, data is
simulated from a predetermined covariance matrix following a Toeplitz
structure. The data is then passed to `cvCovEst()`

along with
a handful of estimators.

```
set.seed(1584)
toep_sim <- function(p, rho, alpha) {
times <- seq_len(p)
H <- abs(outer(times, times, "-")) + diag(p)
H <- H^-(1 + alpha) * rho
covmat <- H + diag(p) * (1 - rho)
sign_mat <- sapply(
times,
function(i) {
sapply(
times,
function(j) {
(-1)^(abs(i - j))
}
)
}
)
return(covmat * sign_mat)
}
# simulate a 100 x 100 covariance matrix
sim_covmat <- toep_sim(p = 100, rho = 0.6, alpha = 0.3)
# sample 75 observations from multivariate normal mean = 0, var = sim_covmat
sim_dat <- MASS::mvrnorm(n = 100, mu = rep(0, 100), Sigma = sim_covmat)
# run CV-selector
cv_cov_est_sim <- cvCovEst(
dat = sim_dat,
estimators = c(
linearShrinkEst, thresholdingEst, bandingEst, adaptiveLassoEst,
sampleCovEst, taperingEst
),
estimator_params = list(
linearShrinkEst = list(alpha = seq(0.25, 0.75, 0.05)),
thresholdingEst = list(gamma = seq(0.25, 0.75, 0.05)),
bandingEst = list(k = seq(2L, 10L, 2L)),
adaptiveLassoEst = list(lambda = c(0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1), n = seq(1, 5)),
taperingEst = list(k = seq(2L, 10L, 2L))
),
cv_scheme = "v_fold",
v_folds = 5
)
```

The `summary()`

method is then used to compare the best
performing estimators in each class:

```
## # A tibble: 6 × 6
## estimator hyperparameter cv_risk cond_num sign sparsity
## <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <dbl>
## 1 taperingEst k = 6 558. 9.65e 1 PD 0.89
## 2 bandingEst k = 4 559. -4.92e 1 IND 0.91
## 3 adaptiveLassoEst lambda = 0.25, n = 2 573. -2.92e 1 IND 0.93
## 4 thresholdingEst gamma = 0.4 576. -1.42e 1 IND 0.97
## 5 linearShrinkEst alpha = 0.45 593. 6.65e 0 PD 0
## 6 sampleCovEst hyperparameters = NA 667. -2.92e16 IND 0
```

In this case, the tapering estimator with `k = 6`

achieves
the lowest empirical risk. It is also one of the few positive definite
matrices, though its condition number is worse than that of the linear
shrinkage estimator’s estimate. The resulting estimate is also less
sparse than that of the other sparsity-enforcing estimators “best”
estimates.

We can take a closer look at the estimator’s performance based on
other possible hyperparameter values by hashing `taperingEst`

from the `hyperRisk`

list.

```
## # A tibble: 5 × 3
## hyperparameters cv_risk stat
## <chr> <chr> <chr>
## 1 k = 6 558 min
## 2 k = 6 558 Q1
## 3 k = 4 559 median
## 4 k = 10 561 Q3
## 5 k = 2 572 max
```

By specifying `plot_type = "risk"`

, we can see the change
in empirical risk as the value of `k`

changes. A summary of
the cross-validation scheme and loss function is displayed at the bottom
of all `cvCovEst`

plot outputs.

We can also examine the matrix structure as the value of
`k`

changes. Examining the overall sparsity of the resulting
estimator can be useful since, in some cases, the assumption of sparsity
is not warranted. Note that the absolute values of the estimate’s
entries are displayed to emphasize the structural differences between
choices of hyperparameters.

If the signs of the covariances are of interest, they can be
displayed by setting `abs_v = FALSE`

:

```
plot(cv_cov_est_sim, dat_orig = sim_dat, plot_type = "heatmap",
stat = c("min", "median", "max"), abs_v = FALSE)
```

The difference between the optimal estimator selected by
`cvCovEst()`

and the sample covariance matrix is clear when
displaying their respective heat maps side by side.

```
plot(cv_cov_est_sim, dat_orig = sim_dat, plot_type = "heatmap",
estimator = c("taperingEst", "sampleCovEst"),
stat = c("min"), abs_v = FALSE)
```

We may also be interested in the eigenvalues of the various banding
estimators. The distribution of eigenvalues relays information such as
the condition number or the positive-definiteness of the resulting
estimator. As with the other plot types, if the `estimator`

argument is not specified, the default is to display the optimal
estimator selected by `cvCovEst()`

.

Specifying multiple values in the `estimator`

argument
allows us compare the eigenvalues of the other estimator classes as
well.

```
plot(cv_cov_est_sim, dat_orig = sim_dat, plot_type = "eigen",
stat = c("min", "median", "max"),
estimator = c("taperingEst", "bandingEst", "linearShrinkEst",
"adaptiveLassoEst"))
```

As previously mentioned, simply calling the `plot()`

on
the output of `cvCovEst()`

and providing the original data
will result in a visual summary of the selected estimator.

Bickel, Peter J., and Elizaveta Levina. 2008a. “Regularized
Estimation of Large Covariance Matrices.” *Annals of
Statistics* 36 (1): 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053607000000758.

———. 2008b. “Covariance Regularization by Thresholding.”
*Annals of Statistics* 36 (6): 2577–2604. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOS600.

Boileau, Philippe, Nima S. Hejazi, Mark J. van der Laan, and Sandrine
Dudoit. 2021. “Cross-Validated Loss-Based Covariance Matrix
Estimator Selection in High Dimensions.” https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09715.

Cai, T. Tony, Cun-Hui Zhang, and Harrison H. Zhou. 2010. “Optimal
Rates of Convergence for Covariance Matrix Estimation.” *Ann.
Statist.* 38 (4): 2118–44. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOS752.

Donoho, David, Matan Gavish, and Iain Johnstone. 2018. “Optimal shrinkage of eigenvalues in the spiked covariance
model.” *The Annals of Statistics* 46 (4): 1742–78.

Dudoit, Sandrine, and Mark J van der Laan. 2003. “Asymptotics of
Cross-Validated Risk Estimation in Estimator Selection and Performance
Assessment.” Working Paper 126. U.c. Berkeley Division of
Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Berkeley: University of California,
Berkeley. https://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper126/.

Dudoit, Sandrine, and Mark J. van der Laan. 2005. “Asymptotics of
Cross-Validated Risk Estimation in Estimator Selection and Performance
Assessment.” *Statistical Methodology* 2 (2): 131–54.

Fan, Jianqing, and Runze Li. 2001. “Variable Selection via
Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and Its Oracle Properties.”
*Journal of the American Statistical Association* 96 (456):
1348–60. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501753382273.

Fan, Jianqing, Yuan Liao, and Han Liu. 2016. “An Overview of the
Estimation of Large Covariance and Precision Matrices.” *The
Econometrics Journal* 19 (1): C1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ectj.12061.

Fan, Jianqing, Yuan Liao, and Martina Mincheva. 2013. “Large
Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal
Complements.” *Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.
Series B (Statistical Methodology)* 75 (4): 603–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24772450.

Fan, Jianqing, Han Liu, and Weichen Wang. 2018. “Large Covariance
Estimation Through Elliptical Factor Models.” *Ann.
Statist.* 46 (4): 1383–1414. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOS1588.

Ledoit, Olivier, and Michael Wolf. 2004. “A Well-Conditioned
Estimator for Large-Dimensional Covariance Matrices.” *Journal
of Multivariate Analysis* 88 (2): 365–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-259X(03)00096-4.

———. 2018. “Analytical Nonlinear Shrinkage of Large-Dimensional
Covariance Matrices.” 264. Department of Economics - University
of Zurich. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zur:econwp:264.

Rothman, Adam J., Elizaveta Levina, and Ji Zhu. 2009. “Generalized
Thresholding of Large Covariance Matrices.” *Journal of the
American Statistical Association* 104 (485): 177–86. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.0101.

Schäfer, Juliane, and Korbinian Strimmer. 2005. “A Shrinkage
Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications
for Functional Genomics.” *Statistical Applications in
Genetics and Molecular Biology* 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1175.

van der Vaart, Aad W, Sandrine Dudoit, and Mark J van der Laan. 2006.
“Oracle Inequalities for Multi-Fold Cross Validation.”
*Statistics and Decisions* 24: 351–71.